1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.18%
Positive revenue growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
42.47%
Positive gross profit growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
250.30%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 28.00%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
217.02%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 28.00%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
197.84%
Positive net income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
197.58%
Positive EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
197.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.23%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 26.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
19.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 4997.T's 25.39%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
34.41%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 4997.T's 42.79%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
100.00%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to 4997.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
35.99%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 22.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
4.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
217.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 48.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
150.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 37.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.94%
Our AR growth while 4997.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-4.53%
Inventory is declining while 4997.T stands at 46.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.21%
Asset growth well under 50% of 4997.T's 3.21%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.23%
Positive BV/share change while 4997.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.11%
We’re deleveraging while 4997.T stands at 69.23%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.84%
We cut SG&A while 4997.T invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.