PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-33.30%
Negative revenue growth while 4997.T stands at 36.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-39.40%
Negative gross profit growth while 4997.T is at 50.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3529.69%
Negative EBIT growth while 4997.T is at 61.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1904.15%
Negative operating income growth while 4997.T is at 61.29%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-262.13%
Negative net income growth while 4997.T stands at 134.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-262.21%
Negative EPS growth while 4997.T is at 134.78%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-262.21%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 4997.T is at 134.78%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.25%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 74.97%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-28.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 18.54%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-14.36%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 11.68%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.57%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 4997.T is at 135.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-177.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 4997.T is 177.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-149.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T is 107.92%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
369.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 54.80%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
47.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 4.99%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
12.62%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 3.10%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.86%
Our AR growth while 4997.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
13.08%
We show growth while 4997.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.98%
Positive asset growth while 4997.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.56%
We have a declining book value while 4997.T shows 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.32%
We have some new debt while 4997.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.35%
We cut SG&A while 4997.T invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.