PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
54.18%
Positive revenue growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
46.39%
Positive gross profit growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
84.64%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 11.11%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
62.55%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 11.11%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
70.19%
Positive net income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
70.18%
Positive EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
70.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 4997.T's 31.12%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
1.20%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 4997.T's 4.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-10.83%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 4997.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.80%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 4997.T is at 45.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-184.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 4997.T is 29.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-167.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T is 75.17%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
363.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 55.87%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
45.89%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 4.77%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
13.94%
Positive short-term equity growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
4.92%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 4997.T's 35.38%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
4.17%
Asset growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 2.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-0.05%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.90%
We have some new debt while 4997.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
12.70%
R&D growth of 12.70% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
3.92%
SG&A growth of 3.92% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.