PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-58.66%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-57.94%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-108.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-113.57%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-105.56%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-105.56%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-105.56%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 4997.T's 42.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
90.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 7.69%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
18.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 8.34%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.57%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 4997.T's 174.79%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
77.57%
Below 50% of 4997.T's 3276.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
76.53%
Below 50% of 4997.T's 406.91%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
406.76%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 50.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
64.03%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.57%
Positive short-term equity growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.79%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-7.37%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.91%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.44%
Positive BV/share change while 4997.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-17.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-19.85%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
2.44%
We expand SG&A while 4997.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.