PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.95%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 4997.T's 6.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
33.30%
Positive gross profit growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
237.33%
Positive EBIT growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
183.77%
Positive operating income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
171.36%
Positive net income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
171.48%
Positive EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
171.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.60%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 65.42%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
65.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 16.78%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
15.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.82%
Below 50% of 4997.T's 327.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
126.35%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 4997.T's 149.55%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
110.78%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 4997.T's 186.11%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
430.44%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 51.98%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
66.80%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 3.07%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.05%
Our AR growth while 4997.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
15.00%
We show growth while 4997.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.49%
Asset growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 2.42%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.63%
1.25-1.5x 4997.T's 0.51%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
20.25%
We have some new debt while 4997.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.94%
R&D growth of 2.94% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
30.22%
SG&A growth of 30.22% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.