PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.52%
Positive revenue growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.07%
Positive gross profit growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-23.79%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.85%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-39.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-40.07%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-40.07%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 4997.T's 61.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
70.25%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 14.51%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
51.85%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 19.22%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.55%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 4997.T is at 6.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.82%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 4997.T is 94.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
109.89%
Positive short-term CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
284.19%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 60.10%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
35.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 14.93%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
26.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 12.64%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.25%
Our AR growth while 4997.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.64%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 4997.T's 16.44%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.58%
Positive asset growth while 4997.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.22%
We have a declining book value while 4997.T shows 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.58%
We have some new debt while 4997.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.28%
R&D growth of 1.28% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-17.74%
We cut SG&A while 4997.T invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.