PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.36%
Positive revenue growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
40.59%
Positive gross profit growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
598.26%
Positive EBIT growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
384.97%
Positive operating income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
292.56%
Positive net income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
292.37%
Positive EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
292.37%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.81%
OCF growth of 2.81% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
2.81%
FCF growth of 2.81% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
23.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 4997.T's 103.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
67.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 20.63%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
116.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 27.94%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1556.42%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 103.85% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
163.94%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 101.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
158.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
118.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 72.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
43.70%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 28.06%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
32.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 4997.T's 25.67%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.97%
Our AR growth while 4997.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
8.23%
Inventory growth well above 4997.T's 14.68%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.15%
Positive asset growth while 4997.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.30%
75-90% of 4997.T's 1.60%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
12.26%
We have some new debt while 4997.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
3.28%
R&D growth of 3.28% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-17.24%
We cut SG&A while 4997.T invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.