PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.71%
Revenue growth under 50% of 4997.T's 75.70%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
18.08%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 4997.T's 64.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-40.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-39.22%
Negative operating income growth while 4997.T is at 253.58%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-66.67%
Negative net income growth while 4997.T stands at 333.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-66.68%
Negative EPS growth while 4997.T is at 333.54%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-66.68%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 4997.T is at 333.54%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 4997.T is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.00%
Slight or no buyback while 4997.T is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 37.80%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
10.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 4997.T's 56.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
39.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 4997.T's 34.02%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.21%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-76.33%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 4997.T is 4.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-8.36%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T is 12.65%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
117.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 47.22%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
49.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 4997.T's 37.38%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
29.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to 4997.T's 28.42%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.08%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 4997.T's 57.25%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-19.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.37%
Negative asset growth while 4997.T invests at 13.30%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while 4997.T shows 6.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-15.39%
We’re deleveraging while 4997.T stands at 33.51%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.21%
We expand SG&A while 4997.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.