PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
176.32%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 7.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
314.14%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 20.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
284.85%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 51.19%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
183.92%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 109.86%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
146.73%
Net income growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 3.75%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
146.73%
EPS growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 3.69%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
146.73%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 3.69%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
196.35%
Positive OCF growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
196.35%
Positive FCF growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-22.91%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-22.91%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.91%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.98%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
125.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
125.98%
Positive short-term CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.