1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
214.13%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 7.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
67.11%
Positive gross profit growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
65.51%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
62.95%
Positive operating income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
43.67%
Positive net income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
43.69%
Positive EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
43.69%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Share count expansion well above 5715.T's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above 5715.T's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.75%
Positive OCF growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
128.75%
Positive FCF growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-89.90%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-89.90%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-89.90%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
94.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
94.93%
Positive short-term CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Inventory is declining while 5715.T stands at 3.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.29%
Asset growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 1.06%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-10.32%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.55%
We’re deleveraging while 5715.T stands at 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.