PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
76.97%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 18.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
295.25%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 13.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
115.96%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
117.36%
Operating income growth under 50% of 5715.T's 827.59%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
87.26%
Positive net income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
87.27%
Positive EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
87.27%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.96%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-88.96%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-88.96%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
98.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
98.53%
Positive short-term CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.83%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.84%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.86%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-23.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.