PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.71%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 3.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
14.85%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 0.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
17.14%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
33.49%
Positive operating income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
25.25%
Positive net income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.24%
Positive EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.24%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 5715.T stands at 59.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-92.89%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 5715.T stands at 59.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-35.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
101.74%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 5715.T's 126.50%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
101.74%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 5715.T's 126.50%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
-78.48%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 5715.T is 39.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-72.49%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 5715.T stands at 12.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-72.49%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 5715.T is at 12.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
107.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 2.62%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.74%
Our AR growth while 5715.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-18.22%
Inventory is declining while 5715.T stands at 20.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.90%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
123.46%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 10.22%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-49.63%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.35%
SG&A growth well above 5715.T's 8.10%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.