PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.17%
Positive revenue growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
41.38%
Positive gross profit growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
473.50%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
226.92%
Positive operating income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2675.78%
Net income growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 89.17%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
2573.08%
EPS growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 89.19%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
2573.08%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 89.19%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 5715.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.54%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 5715.T stands at 21.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-82.54%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 5715.T stands at 21.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
76.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
100.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 5715.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
100.00%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to 5715.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to 5715.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
105.52%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 5715.T's 139.65%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
105.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 5715.T's 139.65%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
275.63%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 5715.T's 239.83%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
201.71%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 20.36%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.87%
AR growth well above 5715.T's 15.69%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-20.65%
Inventory is declining while 5715.T stands at 9.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-18.90%
Negative asset growth while 5715.T invests at 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
7.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 4.05%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-23.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
We expand SG&A while 5715.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.