PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
121.05%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 5.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
108.01%
Positive gross profit growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
61.51%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
61.71%
Positive operating income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
58.64%
Positive net income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
58.52%
Positive EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
58.52%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.56%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-26.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 5715.T stands at 4.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-25.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 5715.T stands at 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.13%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 5715.T's 71.81%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
43.50%
Below 50% of 5715.T's 291.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-153.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 5715.T is 842.97%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
217.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 46.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
116.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 52.82%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.59%
AR growth well above 5715.T's 9.58%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.22%
We show growth while 5715.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
10.11%
Positive asset growth while 5715.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.13%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
14.18%
We have some new debt while 5715.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.04%
SG&A growth well above 5715.T's 7.48%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.