PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.18%
Positive revenue growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
42.47%
Positive gross profit growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
250.30%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 23.11%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
217.02%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 16.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
197.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 26.60%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
197.58%
EPS growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 26.64%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
197.58%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 26.64%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 5715.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.23%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 5715.T stands at 10.83%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
19.03%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
34.41%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
100.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 5715.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
100.00%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to 5715.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.00%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 142.03%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
35.99%
Below 50% of 5715.T's 260.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
4.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
217.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 48.60%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
150.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 53.87%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.94%
Our AR growth while 5715.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-4.53%
Inventory is declining while 5715.T stands at 5.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.21%
Asset growth well under 50% of 5715.T's 3.12%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.23%
Under 50% of 5715.T's 3.16%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.11%
We’re deleveraging while 5715.T stands at 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.