1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.66%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 9.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
59.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 2.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
246.35%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
278.29%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 4.25%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
273.35%
Net income growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 20.76%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
270.85%
EPS growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 20.76%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
270.85%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 20.76%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.31%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 5715.T stands at 50.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-12.24%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
36.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.45%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 5715.T's 130.74%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-18.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 5715.T is 203.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
212.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 15.99%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-67.71%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 5715.T stands at 49.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
152.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 44.82%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.38%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 32.51%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.05%
Firm’s AR is declining while 5715.T shows 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-27.64%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-16.98%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.53%
Positive BV/share change while 5715.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-48.16%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.