PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-74.56%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-63.83%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-103.97%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-121.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-109.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-109.36%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-109.36%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.24%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 5715.T stands at 30.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
27.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
43.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.14%
Below 50% of 5715.T's 260.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
74.08%
Below 50% of 5715.T's 5162.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
68.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
166.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 71.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
26.44%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 41.76%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.09%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
52.73%
Inventory growth well above 5715.T's 5.45%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-25.56%
Negative asset growth while 5715.T invests at 1.91%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.23%
Positive BV/share change while 5715.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-59.53%
We’re deleveraging while 5715.T stands at 8.49%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.40%
We increase R&D while 5715.T cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-49.75%
We cut SG&A while 5715.T invests at 29.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.