PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.09%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 2.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
99.89%
Positive gross profit growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-98.17%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
91.66%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 4.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-105.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-105.42%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-105.42%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 5715.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 5715.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.65%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 5715.T stands at 30.84%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
52.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 5.18%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
36.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
100.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 5715.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.37%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 163.71%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-133.12%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
31.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 5715.T's 55.39%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
221.28%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 89.30%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
33.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 47.28%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.92%
Our AR growth while 5715.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
16.03%
Inventory growth well above 5715.T's 0.63%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
9.64%
Asset growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 1.32%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.21%
We have a declining book value while 5715.T shows 6.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
22.00%
Debt growth far above 5715.T's 0.70%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.64%
We expand SG&A while 5715.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.