PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
82.87%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 7.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
23.65%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 9.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
47.17%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
134.34%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 22.48%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
100.35%
Positive net income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.35%
Positive EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.69%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
67.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-1.49%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 5715.T stands at 3.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.83%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
51.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
14.30%
Positive short-term CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
253.41%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 59.26%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
44.98%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 13.08%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
33.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 0.22%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.47%
AR growth well above 5715.T's 1.66%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-27.35%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.68%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.50%
Positive BV/share change while 5715.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-13.59%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.51%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.