PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.95%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 5715.T's 14.42%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
33.30%
Positive gross profit growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
237.33%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
183.77%
Positive operating income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
171.36%
Positive net income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
171.48%
Positive EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
171.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above 5715.T's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.60%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 5715.T stands at 34.28%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
65.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 5715.T's 58.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
15.99%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 28.83%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.82%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 5715.T's 126.77%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
126.35%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 178.85%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
110.78%
Positive short-term CAGR while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
430.44%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 119.75%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
66.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 5715.T's 45.31%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
22.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 12.45%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.05%
AR growth well above 5715.T's 0.84%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
15.00%
Inventory growth well above 5715.T's 1.85%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
11.49%
Positive asset growth while 5715.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.63%
Positive BV/share change while 5715.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.25%
We have some new debt while 5715.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.94%
We increase R&D while 5715.T cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
30.22%
SG&A growth well above 5715.T's 22.43%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.