PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.28%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 3.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
14.06%
Positive gross profit growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.39%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
41.30%
Positive operating income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-38.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-38.37%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-38.09%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.03%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.03%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.73%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 5715.T stands at 16.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-21.98%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 5715.T stands at 24.92%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-23.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 5715.T stands at 17.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 5715.T is at 40.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-70.48%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 5715.T is 111.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-81.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 5715.T is 128.13%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
268.61%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 118.90%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
54.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 29.84%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
21.53%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 5715.T's 26.16%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
Our AR growth while 5715.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-22.64%
Inventory is declining while 5715.T stands at 13.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.44%
Positive asset growth while 5715.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.60%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 2.29%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-33.71%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
18.29%
R&D dropping or stable vs. 5715.T's 332.36%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
8.68%
We expand SG&A while 5715.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.