1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.60%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 14.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-7.70%
Negative gross profit growth while 5715.T is at 23.05%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-24.53%
Negative EBIT growth while 5715.T is at 498.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.68%
Negative operating income growth while 5715.T is at 146.94%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.81%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-20.79%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-20.79%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 31.60%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
52.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 5715.T's 43.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
24.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 13.99%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
790.14%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 375.15% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
42.26%
Below 50% of 5715.T's 304.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
69.31%
Below 50% of 5715.T's 148.40%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
140.71%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with 5715.T's 149.15%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
58.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 5715.T's 71.02%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
35.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 5715.T's 46.26%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.29%
AR growth well above 5715.T's 11.33%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.50%
We show growth while 5715.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.87%
Asset growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 0.54%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.69%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 2.45%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
26.34%
We have some new debt while 5715.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.83%
We expand SG&A while 5715.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.