PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.71%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 4.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
18.08%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 8.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-40.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-39.22%
Negative operating income growth while 5715.T is at 12.93%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-66.67%
Negative net income growth while 5715.T stands at 0.75%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-66.68%
Negative EPS growth while 5715.T is at 1.96%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-66.68%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 5715.T is at 1.96%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 5715.T is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.00%
Slight or no buyback while 5715.T is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 37.74%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
10.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 5715.T's 40.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
39.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 16.20%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.21%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-76.33%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 5715.T is 60475.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-8.36%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 5715.T is 166.26%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
117.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with 5715.T's 114.29%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
49.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 89.51%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
29.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 46.28%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.08%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 5715.T's 2.64%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-19.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.37%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while 5715.T shows 2.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-15.39%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.21%
SG&A growth well above 5715.T's 5.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.