1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.79%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
81.56%
Positive EBIT growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
66.67%
Positive operating income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
207.69%
Positive net income growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
207.73%
Positive EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
207.73%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 5715.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
272.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 36.16%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
56.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 5715.T's 57.97%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
41.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 4.77%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
232.74%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 88.64% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
519.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 232.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
730.40%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 5715.T's 15.95%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
130.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with 5715.T's 121.30%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
55.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 83.92%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
34.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 5715.T's 52.32%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.29%
Our AR growth while 5715.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
12.63%
We show growth while 5715.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.81%
Positive asset growth while 5715.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.25%
75-90% of 5715.T's 3.82%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
15.08%
We have some new debt while 5715.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.23%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.