PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
176.32%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 35.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
314.14%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 31.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
284.85%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 133.87%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
183.92%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 2.83%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
146.73%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x 6203.T's 127.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
146.73%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x 6203.T's 127.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
146.73%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x 6203.T's 127.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
196.35%
Positive OCF growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
196.35%
Positive FCF growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-22.91%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-22.91%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.91%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.98%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 238.71%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
125.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 238.71%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
125.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 6203.T's 238.71%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.