PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-75.20%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-79.43%
Negative gross profit growth while 6203.T is at 3.63%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-132.04%
Negative EBIT growth while 6203.T is at 143.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-139.35%
Negative operating income growth while 6203.T is at 45.53%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-157.87%
Negative net income growth while 6203.T stands at 137.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-157.88%
Negative EPS growth while 6203.T is at 137.10%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-157.88%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6203.T is at 137.10%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-207.70%
Negative OCF growth while 6203.T is at 1812.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-207.70%
Negative FCF growth while 6203.T is at 1321.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-88.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6203.T stands at 75.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-88.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 75.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-88.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 75.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
92.22%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
92.22%
Positive OCF/share growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
92.22%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
83.81%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 147.48%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
83.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 147.48%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
83.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 6203.T's 147.48%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 6203.T shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
101.06%
We show growth while 6203.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.62%
Positive asset growth while 6203.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-19.38%
We have a declining book value while 6203.T shows 1.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.92%
We have some new debt while 6203.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.