1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
214.13%
Positive revenue growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
67.11%
Positive gross profit growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
65.51%
Positive EBIT growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
62.95%
Positive operating income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
43.67%
Positive net income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
43.69%
Positive EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
43.69%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 6203.T's 0.00%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 6203.T's 0.00%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.75%
OCF growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 5.23%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
128.75%
FCF growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 1.61%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-89.90%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-89.90%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-89.90%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.93%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 135.13%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
94.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 135.13%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
94.93%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 6203.T's 135.13%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Inventory is declining while 6203.T stands at 16.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.29%
Positive asset growth while 6203.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-10.32%
We have a declining book value while 6203.T shows 0.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-2.55%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.