PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.58%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.14%
Negative gross profit growth while 6203.T is at 4.50%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.71%
Negative EBIT growth while 6203.T is at 42.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-23.04%
Negative operating income growth while 6203.T is at 9.91%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.52%
Negative net income growth while 6203.T stands at 50.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-49.97%
Negative EPS growth while 6203.T is at 1409.16%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-49.97%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6203.T is at 1409.16%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
24.85%
Slight or no buybacks while 6203.T is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
24.85%
Slight or no buyback while 6203.T is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.25%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6203.T stands at 784.04%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-91.25%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 784.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-18.07%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 1120.04%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
101.91%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 1062.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
101.91%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 1062.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
620.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 6203.T's 1037.13%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.83%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 999.27%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.23%
Firm’s AR is declining while 6203.T shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
12.45%
Inventory growth well above 6203.T's 14.33%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.28%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 1.60%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-12.52%
We have a declining book value while 6203.T shows 958.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.66%
We have some new debt while 6203.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.07%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 6203.T's 2.15%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.