PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.71%
Positive revenue growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.85%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 3.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
17.14%
EBIT growth below 50% of 6203.T's 45.19%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
33.49%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 20.42%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
25.25%
Net income growth under 50% of 6203.T's 89.26%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
25.24%
EPS growth under 50% of 6203.T's 89.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.24%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 6203.T's 89.26%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6203.T stands at 766.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-92.89%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 766.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-35.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 742.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
101.74%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 3863.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
101.74%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 3863.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-78.48%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6203.T is 437.65%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-72.49%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 6203.T stands at 982.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-72.49%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 6203.T is at 982.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
107.07%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 1256.73%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.74%
AR growth well above 6203.T's 3.28%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-18.22%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.90%
Negative asset growth while 6203.T invests at 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
123.46%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 6.52%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-49.63%
We’re deleveraging while 6203.T stands at 9.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.35%
We expand SG&A while 6203.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.