PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
123.92%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 34.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
59.80%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x 6203.T's 54.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
472.45%
EBIT growth similar to 6203.T's 512.33%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
382.35%
Operating income growth under 50% of 6203.T's 1470.37%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
114.35%
Net income growth under 50% of 6203.T's 395.12%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
114.72%
EPS growth under 50% of 6203.T's 4839.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
114.72%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 6203.T's 4839.33%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.68%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6203.T stands at 739.42%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-90.68%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 739.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-7.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 1139.96%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
100.28%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 1555.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
100.28%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 1555.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
105.50%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 4044.39%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.61%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 1266.29%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.24%
AR growth well above 6203.T's 0.30%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.64%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
15.71%
Positive asset growth while 6203.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.73%
Under 50% of 6203.T's 939.34%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
18.91%
We have some new debt while 6203.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.89%
SG&A growth well above 6203.T's 5.14%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.