PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-70.15%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-60.19%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-145.06%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-176.21%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-205.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-204.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-204.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.28%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6203.T stands at 42.11%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-88.28%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 42.11%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-47.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 4.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.08%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 6203.T's 107.71%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
94.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 6203.T's 107.71%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
71.55%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 6203.T's 100.02%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 42.64%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.60%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
89.37%
Inventory growth well above 6203.T's 17.85%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
24.71%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 1.50%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-0.96%
We have a declining book value while 6203.T shows 3.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
96.39%
We have some new debt while 6203.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-10.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.