1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
60.43%
Positive revenue growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
95.88%
Positive gross profit growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1795.68%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 11.81%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1274.00%
Positive operating income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
742.67%
Net income growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 27.73%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
760.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 27.66%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
760.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 27.66%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.82%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-16.54%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-32.65%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.34%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 192.82%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-46.33%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 6203.T is 108.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-45.58%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-67.62%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 6203.T stands at 29.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
143.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 61.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
119.32%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 33.41%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.10%
Our AR growth while 6203.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-37.71%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-15.37%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
9.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 1.70%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-37.98%
We’re deleveraging while 6203.T stands at 10.06%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.31%
We expand SG&A while 6203.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.