PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
121.05%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 21.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
108.01%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 30.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
61.51%
EBIT growth below 50% of 6203.T's 128.43%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
61.71%
Operating income growth under 50% of 6203.T's 124.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
58.64%
Net income growth at 50-75% of 6203.T's 114.78%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
58.52%
EPS growth at 50-75% of 6203.T's 114.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
58.52%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of 6203.T's 114.80%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6203.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.56%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-26.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 5.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-25.63%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.13%
Similar net income/share CAGR to 6203.T's 106.10%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
43.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-153.66%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
217.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 54.47%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
116.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 31.90%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.59%
Our AR growth while 6203.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.22%
Inventory growth well above 6203.T's 7.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
10.11%
Positive asset growth while 6203.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.13%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
14.18%
We have some new debt while 6203.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.04%
We expand SG&A while 6203.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.