PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.66%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 18.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
59.90%
Positive gross profit growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
246.35%
Positive EBIT growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
278.29%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 158.14%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
273.35%
Positive net income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
270.85%
Positive EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
270.85%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.31%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6203.T stands at 1.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-12.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6203.T stands at 25.32%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
36.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.45%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 67.64% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-18.35%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
212.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-67.71%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 6203.T stands at 20.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
152.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 38.59%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.05%
Firm’s AR is declining while 6203.T shows 26.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-27.64%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-16.98%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.53%
Positive BV/share change while 6203.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-48.16%
We’re deleveraging while 6203.T stands at 47.96%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.