PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.42%
Positive revenue growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
53.62%
Positive gross profit growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
250.85%
Positive EBIT growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
256.00%
Positive operating income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
171.88%
Positive net income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
171.96%
Positive EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
171.96%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6203.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6203.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.26%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-27.58%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-44.20%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.52%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 51.85% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-49.90%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-72.56%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 36.90%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
11.06%
Positive short-term equity growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.99%
Our AR growth while 6203.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
16.65%
We show growth while 6203.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
16.62%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 3.02%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.81%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 2.56%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
18.95%
We have some new debt while 6203.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.19%
R&D growth of 4.19% while 6203.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
0.31%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 6203.T's 6.82%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.