PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
33.01%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 15.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
2.27%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 6203.T's 6.32%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3437.74%
Positive EBIT growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-90.62%
Negative operating income growth while 6203.T is at 58.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1636.83%
Positive net income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1636.88%
Positive EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1636.88%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6203.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.78%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-37.77%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-30.47%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
115.89%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 51.90% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
197.59%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
355.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
184.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 20.52%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
35.65%
Positive short-term equity growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.26%
AR growth well above 6203.T's 22.76%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
159.90%
We show growth while 6203.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
92.27%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 0.25%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.38%
Positive BV/share change while 6203.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
331.15%
We have some new debt while 6203.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 6203.T invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
99.74%
We expand SG&A while 6203.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.