PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.09%
Positive revenue growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
99.89%
Positive gross profit growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-98.17%
Negative EBIT growth while 6203.T is at 129.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
91.66%
Positive operating income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-105.57%
Negative net income growth while 6203.T stands at 112.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-105.42%
Negative EPS growth while 6203.T is at 112.70%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-105.42%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6203.T is at 112.70%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6203.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6203.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.65%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
52.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
36.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.37%
Similar net income/share CAGR to 6203.T's 105.02%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-133.12%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
31.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
221.28%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
33.66%
Positive short-term equity growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.92%
Our AR growth while 6203.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
16.03%
Inventory growth well above 6203.T's 15.41%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
9.64%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 2.91%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.21%
We have a declining book value while 6203.T shows 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
22.00%
Debt growth far above 6203.T's 23.59%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.64%
We expand SG&A while 6203.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.