PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
107.72%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 16.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
75.60%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 4.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
455.86%
Positive EBIT growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
472.53%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 26.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
7329.63%
Positive net income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7314.06%
Positive EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7314.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 6203.T is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.19%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
70.09%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 0.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
63.16%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.05%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 309.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
457.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
66.19%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 746.49%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-55.22%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 6203.T stands at 19.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
58.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 1.25%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
38.69%
Positive short-term equity growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.92%
Firm’s AR is declining while 6203.T shows 16.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-28.20%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-17.08%
Negative asset growth while 6203.T invests at 4.51%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
11.94%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 3.11%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-43.50%
We’re deleveraging while 6203.T stands at 37.97%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.71%
We expand SG&A while 6203.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.