PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-55.89%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-45.42%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-98.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-102.86%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-117.37%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-117.36%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-117.36%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.41%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
137.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
70.80%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.64%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
68.35%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 101.76%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-112.07%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6203.T is 103.02%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
336.54%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 43.25%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
48.43%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
32.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 0.27%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.24%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
11.79%
Inventory growth well above 6203.T's 10.08%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-5.75%
Negative asset growth while 6203.T invests at 1.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.41%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-6.79%
We’re deleveraging while 6203.T stands at 42.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-11.69%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.