1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.62%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 16.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
17.58%
Positive gross profit growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
170.34%
Positive EBIT growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
99.60%
Positive operating income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
579.76%
Net income growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 7.91%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
577.93%
EPS growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 7.90%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
581.13%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 7.90%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.03%
Slight or no buyback while 6203.T is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.63%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
80.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 5.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
35.16%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.87%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
149.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 269.12%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
2161.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
407.24%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 50.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
61.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 10.05%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
31.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 12.69%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.10%
Our AR growth while 6203.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-9.50%
Inventory is declining while 6203.T stands at 6.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.44%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 0.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.19%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 1.31%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
19.79%
We have some new debt while 6203.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
13.85%
We increase R&D while 6203.T cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.26%
We expand SG&A while 6203.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.