PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
119.74%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 20.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
106.31%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 16.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
630.40%
Positive EBIT growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
476.51%
Operating income growth similar to 6203.T's 516.13%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
531.62%
Positive net income growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
531.75%
Positive EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
531.75%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
67.88%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-1.30%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
2.63%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
411.01%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6203.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-8.27%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-18.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
127.28%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 18.16%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
43.12%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 16.70%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
27.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 10.68%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.72%
Our AR growth while 6203.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-27.32%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.69%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 1.56%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.24%
Positive BV/share change while 6203.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
7.36%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 6203.T's 15.36%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
12.22%
R&D dropping or stable vs. 6203.T's 375.47%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
41.42%
SG&A growth well above 6203.T's 3.13%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.