PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
33.68%
Revenue growth similar to 6203.T's 35.04%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
82.08%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 42.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
2494.90%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 102.79%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
2700.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 298.44%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
994.44%
Net income growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 72.14%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
995.04%
EPS growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 72.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
995.04%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 72.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6203.T is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6203.T is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 2.99%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
72.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 25.40%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
50.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 6203.T's 52.66%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
224.53%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 90.19% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
268.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 136.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1353.39%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 40.63%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
132.74%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 14.66%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
60.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 19.91%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
34.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 10.23%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.12%
AR growth well above 6203.T's 16.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
10.39%
Inventory growth well above 6203.T's 2.44%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
11.85%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 2.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.08%
Positive BV/share change while 6203.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
14.16%
Debt growth far above 6203.T's 4.83%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.36%
We expand SG&A while 6203.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.