PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.71%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of 6203.T's 41.26%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
18.08%
Positive gross profit growth while 6203.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-40.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-39.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-66.67%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-66.68%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-66.68%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 6203.T is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.00%
Slight or no buyback while 6203.T is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 45.69%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
10.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 6203.T's 36.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
39.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6203.T's 32.83%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.21%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-76.33%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-8.36%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
117.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 16.53%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
49.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 28.36%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
29.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 11.73%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.08%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 6203.T's 36.86%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-19.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.37%
Negative asset growth while 6203.T invests at 2.89%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while 6203.T shows 0.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-15.39%
We’re deleveraging while 6203.T stands at 17.37%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.21%
We expand SG&A while 6203.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.