1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.79%
Negative gross profit growth while 6203.T is at 22.48%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
81.56%
EBIT growth below 50% of 6203.T's 213.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
66.67%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 6203.T's 97.27%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
207.69%
Net income growth under 50% of 6203.T's 442.57%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
207.73%
EPS growth under 50% of 6203.T's 442.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
207.73%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 6203.T's 442.77%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
272.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 23.02%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
56.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 31.34%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
41.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6203.T's 34.65%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
232.74%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6203.T's 412.25%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
519.38%
Below 50% of 6203.T's 17663.79%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
730.40%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 56.91%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
130.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 15.56%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
55.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 29.77%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
34.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6203.T's 11.41%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.29%
Our AR growth while 6203.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
12.63%
Inventory growth well above 6203.T's 16.12%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.81%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 1.13%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.25%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 0.27%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
15.08%
We have some new debt while 6203.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.23%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.