Ishikawa Seisakusho, Ltd. (6208.T)

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 63.64%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6247.T's 48.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.

3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6247.T's 36.76%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 122.03% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 23.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 17.88%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 22.72%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 19.68%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 12.71%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Our AR growth while 6247.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Positive asset growth while 6247.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while 6247.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while 6247.T invests at 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.