PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
176.32%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 9.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
314.14%
Positive gross profit growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
284.85%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
183.92%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 0.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
146.73%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
146.73%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
146.73%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
196.35%
OCF growth at 50-75% of 6247.T's 266.66%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
196.35%
FCF growth 50-75% of 6247.T's 266.66%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
-22.91%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-22.91%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.91%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.98%
Below 50% of 6247.T's 476.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
125.98%
Below 50% of 6247.T's 476.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
125.98%
Below 50% of 6247.T's 476.28%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.