PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.87%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 8.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
120.50%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 38.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
726.06%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 133.58%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1696.87%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x 6247.T's 1444.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
3130.35%
Net income growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 137.65%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
3130.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 137.61%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
3130.71%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 137.61%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.96%
Positive OCF growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
236.96%
Positive FCF growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-89.00%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-89.00%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-89.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-88.98%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-88.98%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-88.98%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
108.09%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
108.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
108.09%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-86.72%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 6247.T stands at 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-86.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 6247.T is at 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-86.72%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 6247.T is at 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.48%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-11.36%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
42.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 0.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-8.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.