PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-75.20%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-79.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-132.04%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-139.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-157.87%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-157.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-157.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6247.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6247.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-207.70%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-207.70%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-88.47%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-88.47%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-88.47%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
92.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 6247.T's 99.71%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
92.22%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to 6247.T's 99.71%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
92.22%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to 6247.T's 99.71%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
83.81%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
83.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
83.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
101.06%
We show growth while 6247.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.62%
Positive asset growth while 6247.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-19.38%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
5.92%
We have some new debt while 6247.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.