PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-32.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
43.36%
Positive gross profit growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
347.61%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
228.08%
Positive operating income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
140.65%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
140.64%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
140.64%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-265.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-265.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-90.11%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-90.11%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-90.11%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
94.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
94.46%
Positive OCF/share growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
94.46%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
101.47%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
101.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
101.47%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.89%
We show growth while 6247.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.96%
Asset growth well under 50% of 6247.T's 3.92%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.29%
Under 50% of 6247.T's 4.92%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
8.68%
Debt growth of 8.68% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.