PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
90.78%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 25.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
89.02%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 27.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
204.72%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
370.86%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 76.12%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
521.83%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
522.24%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
522.24%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
436.73%
OCF growth under 50% of 6247.T's 1384.18%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
436.73%
FCF growth under 50% of 6247.T's 1384.18%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-88.96%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-88.96%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-88.96%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-80.93%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-80.93%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-80.93%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
106.67%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
106.67%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
106.67%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-87.23%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 6247.T stands at 5.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-87.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 6247.T is at 5.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-87.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 6247.T is at 5.27%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.20%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-9.55%
Negative asset growth while 6247.T invests at 3.45%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
31.28%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 0.62%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-20.50%
We’re deleveraging while 6247.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.